Valuation & Dealmaking of Technology Based Intellectual Property (2009)
I wish there were none, but my wife found one in less than two minutes, in the acknowledgments, p. xiii, where "forty two" years somehow got mis-printed into just "two" years; in some ways it has seemed like just two years, but it has been 42.
p. 17: IBM patent number has a transposed digit. The number should be: 6,329,919.
p. 593: "vijo" should be "viejo" (Spanish: old). Also, this quotation, like many, can be taken multiple ways. One perspective is the familiar phrase "you can't teach an old dog new tricks." But I defer to, and prefer, the translation given in the text taken from the citation.
I will keep updating this section. |
